It´s Jeffrey Sachs, NOT Jeremy .... (Corbyn) - just saying
at around TC 7:40
Yes. And this is just the beginning.
In Germany the first "NGO" (NON-government??? Ho-Ho-Ho) has been announced to flag online content FOR the government with the explicit right to issue urgent take-down orders!
An the best thing:
German MSM give a shit about it. Legacy media - (what an overblown inadequate term for their incompetent work) - have zero interest in addressing this.
We have reached a pivotal moment where reporters seriously consider CIA and Co. best buddies while they spit on former colleagues who now work for alternative media. A term btw which too has radically changed. I remember when "alternative media" were such unique experiments as Democracy Now or FAIR.org
But that was the 90s or 80s.
Which reminds me of Woody Allen´s odd but not unfunny "Minight in Paris", which is gaming out the notion of "everything used to be better in the past." So that the protagonist ends up argueing whether it wasn´t better in the Stone Age after going back in time to the 1920s and then the 1890s.
p.s. Assange´s Google article which Mark refers to:
I used to follow and $upport the James Corbett channel on YT.
Corbett never monetized it. He claimed to only keep it going through audience support.
Well before they finally took him down for criticizing the lockdowns and looking much too deeply into the "medicines" and Gates and Schwab and just about everything, he was admonishing us to hook up to his other platforms because he was DAMN SURE they would take him down.
This went on, if memory serves, for at least TWO YEARS.
And then they did.
I stopped following his work for other reasons. But I always admired him for not taking their money.
Compare to outfits like The Duran, who will NEVER be canceled. Because the YT revenue MATTERS to them so very obviously. And the effect of this is evident in their work.
Return of the prodigals!
FELICES MUCHOS DE ZELENSKY CANCELS HIS NEXT NOT
FELICES Y GRACIAS EN ZELENSKY CANCELA
It´s Jeffrey Sachs, NOT Jeremy .... (Corbyn) - just saying
at around TC 7:40
Yes. And this is just the beginning.
In Germany the first "NGO" (NON-government??? Ho-Ho-Ho) has been announced to flag online content FOR the government with the explicit right to issue urgent take-down orders!
An the best thing:
German MSM give a shit about it. Legacy media - (what an overblown inadequate term for their incompetent work) - have zero interest in addressing this.
We have reached a pivotal moment where reporters seriously consider CIA and Co. best buddies while they spit on former colleagues who now work for alternative media. A term btw which too has radically changed. I remember when "alternative media" were such unique experiments as Democracy Now or FAIR.org
But that was the 90s or 80s.
Which reminds me of Woody Allen´s odd but not unfunny "Minight in Paris", which is gaming out the notion of "everything used to be better in the past." So that the protagonist ends up argueing whether it wasn´t better in the Stone Age after going back in time to the 1920s and then the 1890s.
p.s. Assange´s Google article which Mark refers to:
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
https://archive.is/ZiG2z
One of my favorite discussions with Rachel! Gonna miss the two of you together . . . .
I used to follow and $upport the James Corbett channel on YT.
Corbett never monetized it. He claimed to only keep it going through audience support.
Well before they finally took him down for criticizing the lockdowns and looking much too deeply into the "medicines" and Gates and Schwab and just about everything, he was admonishing us to hook up to his other platforms because he was DAMN SURE they would take him down.
This went on, if memory serves, for at least TWO YEARS.
And then they did.
I stopped following his work for other reasons. But I always admired him for not taking their money.
Compare to outfits like The Duran, who will NEVER be canceled. Because the YT revenue MATTERS to them so very obviously. And the effect of this is evident in their work.