Macron Calls for EU Sovereignty & Nukes Are Desperate Electioneering, Why Has US Intel Admitted Putin Didn't Kill Navalny?, Western MSM Mea Culpa on Kiev Regime Losses, Russian Gains, more...
Macron Calls for EU Sovereignty & Nukes Are Desperate Electioneering, Why Has US Intel Admitted Putin Didn't Kill Navalny?, Western MSM Mea Culpa on Kiev Regime Losses, Russian Gains, more...
That got me scratching the old scalp. Does the average Frenchie care remotely about "sovereignity"? How about average, normie Germans? I seriously doubt it. Because that would be nationalistic, and we all know what that means ....
If it impacts their food or beer, then they may have deep concerns, but when it comes to who dies, they both are probably hoping even more Ukrainians will die for USA if it means deporting them from the EU.
If anything were to happen to or near to Pres. PUTIN, then US has plausible deniability now, since it has publicly absolved Pres. PUTIN of anything to do with the death of Navalny. So lone wolf/partisan group might just try another Crocus in the locus of Orthodox Easter, Pres.Putin's Inauguration and Victory Day Parade /Holiday. Plausible Deniability.... placing "space" betwixt target/s and assailant/proxy assailants?
I suppose it is possible that even people in government who want to tell the truth are incompetent with respect to decisions about what truth to leak and when. It is also possible, I guess, that the WSJ has been sitting on this leak since Navalny’s death, and decided to finally put it in the paper at a time when it can be easily ignored.
The blazer is nice, but video on substack is a bit hit and miss, at least when received here. If possible, then please can you include the audio only option.
It's not the drone that damaging the tank. It is the munition the drone is carrying. And that's very interesting. I've seen no details but it looks like almost any drone can carry a munition that can sink a tank. So? So such munitions must be very common. So tanks must be expecting to meet them. So what's going on that tanks can't defend against the very thing they're supposed to defend against?
But, but Biden has seen pictures of the beheaded Navalny.
That wouldn't be so funny if European countries had any "Sovereignty",
Surrendered to the "European Union" and dictated to by "The US".
That got me scratching the old scalp. Does the average Frenchie care remotely about "sovereignity"? How about average, normie Germans? I seriously doubt it. Because that would be nationalistic, and we all know what that means ....
If it impacts their food or beer, then they may have deep concerns, but when it comes to who dies, they both are probably hoping even more Ukrainians will die for USA if it means deporting them from the EU.
We have been propagandized into a "Cookie cutter World".
Everybody must be just the same, except the Wealthy, and they like to be envied...D
Actually, I think it is all about the money. Uniformity equals efficiency which means that the biggest producer makes the most profit??
People don't have a value set which is not measured in Dollars.
JM; The more Ukrainians die, the more profits Raythion shareholders make? And apparently, Israeli realtors are selling lots in Gaza?
If anything were to happen to or near to Pres. PUTIN, then US has plausible deniability now, since it has publicly absolved Pres. PUTIN of anything to do with the death of Navalny. So lone wolf/partisan group might just try another Crocus in the locus of Orthodox Easter, Pres.Putin's Inauguration and Victory Day Parade /Holiday. Plausible Deniability.... placing "space" betwixt target/s and assailant/proxy assailants?
I suppose it is possible that even people in government who want to tell the truth are incompetent with respect to decisions about what truth to leak and when. It is also possible, I guess, that the WSJ has been sitting on this leak since Navalny’s death, and decided to finally put it in the paper at a time when it can be easily ignored.
The blazer is nice, but video on substack is a bit hit and miss, at least when received here. If possible, then please can you include the audio only option.
We're watching Mark in the "Green Room" 🤣 . I like it!
"I don't know how things go through a goose" -- and you consider yourself a high-level analyst?! I want my non-money back.
It's not the drone that damaging the tank. It is the munition the drone is carrying. And that's very interesting. I've seen no details but it looks like almost any drone can carry a munition that can sink a tank. So? So such munitions must be very common. So tanks must be expecting to meet them. So what's going on that tanks can't defend against the very thing they're supposed to defend against?
what about if Biden had to announce Putin's innocence as a kind of show of good faith in the course of some negotiations between them?