Is there a list/chronology of simulated nuclear attacks by US/NATO conducted in the past 3 years?
I knew only of one on Kaliningrad early 2022, as reported by Jacques Baud. But he does not give further details.
Would be helpful for discussions.
p.s. if you wonder why I am asking, see e.g. this manipulative, but influential chronology of Russian nuclear threats as documented by the German government affiliated think tank "SWP" - Stiftung für Wissenschaft und Politik - Foundation for Science and Politics in Berlin:
"One year of nuclear rhetoric and escalation management in Russia’s war against Ukraine: An updated chronology
Research Division International Security, Working Paper Nr. 1/2023, February 2023, 165 pages,"
Hopefully, all this blather by NATO and the increasingly Clouseau-like Macron is nothing but a pathetic attempt to divert attention from the day after day pummeling Ukraine is receiving along most of the enormous frontline .
Regardless of the Kremlin logic regarding minismising any response to NATO escalation, main means being certain pro Russian channel that using legal jargon claims no 'red lines' actually crossed, NATO sees this as a weakness and escalates, while Russians concur and are demoralised but unable to alter strategy. Mark mocks Medvedev but it would be interesting if there were a serious evaluation of what Medvedev represents, if anything. I don't see 'good guy, bad guy' tactic nor do I see Putin or senior Russians speaking well of Medvedev. Warrants comment ?
The Biden brigades!
thx!
Is there a list/chronology of simulated nuclear attacks by US/NATO conducted in the past 3 years?
I knew only of one on Kaliningrad early 2022, as reported by Jacques Baud. But he does not give further details.
Would be helpful for discussions.
p.s. if you wonder why I am asking, see e.g. this manipulative, but influential chronology of Russian nuclear threats as documented by the German government affiliated think tank "SWP" - Stiftung für Wissenschaft und Politik - Foundation for Science and Politics in Berlin:
"One year of nuclear rhetoric and escalation management in Russia’s war against Ukraine: An updated chronology
Research Division International Security, Working Paper Nr. 1/2023, February 2023, 165 pages,"
by
Liviu Horovitz
Anna Clara Arndt
pdf
https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/one-year-of-nuclear-rhetoric-and-escalation-management-in-russias-war-against-ukraine-an-updated-chronology
p.s. you don´t have to read 165 pages. You can run through the first few pages of the list to get the point.
Hopefully, all this blather by NATO and the increasingly Clouseau-like Macron is nothing but a pathetic attempt to divert attention from the day after day pummeling Ukraine is receiving along most of the enormous frontline .
Those pics of the old boys.
This is a spoof, right?
If they are legit, then ... no words for it.
A little later ...
So they are for real.
And this Drummon bastard from Pirate Island is cackling with glee. Just like a certain former presidential candidate did over the fate of Ghaddafi.
Where that video of those geriatric conscripts? I can’t find it on Twatter or SukiTube.
join Telegram
Regardless of the Kremlin logic regarding minismising any response to NATO escalation, main means being certain pro Russian channel that using legal jargon claims no 'red lines' actually crossed, NATO sees this as a weakness and escalates, while Russians concur and are demoralised but unable to alter strategy. Mark mocks Medvedev but it would be interesting if there were a serious evaluation of what Medvedev represents, if anything. I don't see 'good guy, bad guy' tactic nor do I see Putin or senior Russians speaking well of Medvedev. Warrants comment ?